USPTO serial 79431184
KISSME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 802
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KISSME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret C. McHugh
Margaret C. McHugh Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, Suite 1900San Francisco, CA 94111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Tweezers; Electric hand-held hair braiders; Hand-operated hoes; digging forks; rakes; Hand-operated lasts for shoemaking; electric flat irons for hair; non-electric flat irons for hair; electric hair styling irons; non-electric hair straightening irons; electric curling tongs; curling tongs; hair straightening irons; electric razors; electric hair clippers; electric nail files; edge tools in the nature of edgers for grout, mortar or cement being hand tools; scissors; eyebrow scissors; hair cutting scissors for infant; nail clippers; nail clippers for infant; nail files; nail files for infant; non-electric razors; nail buffers; non-electric egg slicers; non-electric planes for flaking dried blocks of bonito; non-electric can openers; spoons being tableware; non-electric cheese slicers; non-electric pizza cutters; forks being table cutlery; dressmakers' chalk sharpeners; fireplace shovels for carrying live charcoal (juno); fireplace bellows; fire tongs; bludgeons; shaving cases; pedicure sets; electric pedicure sets; eyelash curlers; electric eyelash curlers; replacement rubber for eyelash curler being parts of eyelash curlers; manicure sets; electric manicure sets; hair-removing tweezers; ice axes; diving knives; diving knife holders; palette knives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2026 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |