USPTO serial 79431226
GANKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURRUS, JESSICA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GANKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; utility software; computer application software; industrial software; computer operating programs; computer gaming software; system software; enterprise software; security software; business software; mobile apps; application development software; web application software; downloadable software applications; office and business applications; programs for computers; multimedia software; media development software; web application and server software; computer networks; web server software; artificial intelligence software; interactive software based on artificial intelligence; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for use in scientific research; computer programs and software for image processing used for mobile phones; augmented reality software; augmented reality software for simulation; augmented reality software for education; interactive software; interactive multimedia software for playing games; visors for helmets; headgear being protective helmets; helmets for use in sports; bags adapted for laptops; cases for telephones; multimedia projectors; interactive computer systems; interactive game software; audio interfaces; television decoders; interactive business software; website development software. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Writing of computer software; installation of computer software; maintenance of websites; website design; rental of web servers; website development services; artificial intelligence consultancy; technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence; research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; providing artificial intelligence computer programs on data networks; software engineering; platforms for artificial intelligence as software as a service [SaaS]; image processing software design; development of augmented reality game software; development of interactive multimedia software; programming of multimedia applications; design and development of multimedia products; video game software development; software development; design of software for processing and distribution of multimedia contents; internet web site design services; web site design consultancy; design of web pages; creation of internet web sites; hosting websites on the internet; web portal design; homepage and webpage design. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |