USPTO serial 79431348
APPHELIX IMPACTFUL ENGINEERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APPHELIX IMPACTFUL ENGINEERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software design and development, computer technology and software consultancy services, software as a service [saas] services, analysis (computer systems-) and design, cloud computing services, information technology (iti) consultancy) technical research and project studies, design and maintenance of web sites for others, hosting of servers, electronic data storage and data back-up services, data duplication and conversion services, data coding services, monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach, protection services (computer virus -) (term considered incomprehensible by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations). | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 20, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |