USPTO serial 79431877
HERMELIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAKESLEE, RICHARD A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with HERMELIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicles, namely side by side vehicles, unmanned ground vehicles, buggies, quads; all of the above in particular for police, security or military purposes; engines for land vehicles; braking systems for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Weapon systems comprised primarily of mobile, ground-based air defense weapon systems comprising launchers, magazines, and projectiles; weapon systems comprised primarily of mobile, ground-based air defense weapon systems comprising launchers, magazines, and projectiles containing aiming devices being fire control devices for guns or cannons; fowling pieces; noise-suppressors for guns; breeches of firearms; sighting devices for firearms namely non-telescopic gun sights for firearms; ammunition; explosives; fireworks; projectiles; shells being projectiles; mortars being firearms; infrared defense rocket warheads; guns; cannons; rockets; rocket launchers; guided missiles; tanks being weapons; unmanned and autonomous tanks; remote-controlled tanks; mine-clearing tanks; anti-aircraft tanks; explosives in the nature of explosive charges for projectiles and weapons; anti-aircraft weapons, namely, anti-aircraft guns and anti-aircraft systems comprised of anti-aircraft guns; explosive devices for minefield breaching and minefield clearance; firearm sights excluding telescopic sights; explosive devices for generating acoustic or optical signals; military decoys being explosive flares, for generating electromagnetic, acoustic, optical and thermal decoys | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance, servicing and repair of vehicles and their parts; maintenance, servicing and repair of engines; maintenance, servicing and repair of defense systems; maintenance, servicing and repair of weapons; maintenance, servicing and repair of weapon systems and their parts. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2025 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |