USPTO serial 79432290
STARDOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, JUSTIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARDOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason L DeFrancesco
Jason L DeFrancesco DeFrancescoLaw174 Nassau Street, No. 325Princeton, NJ 08542United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable encryption software for encrypting and decrypting digital data, communications, and files and computer hardware for use in encryption; downloadable data certification software for certifying the authenticity and integrity of digital data and electronic transactions; downloadable security software for access control, network security, and threat detection; downloadable utility software for cryptographic key generation and management; downloadable security software for intrusion detection and data protection; downloadable cryptographic software for digital signature generation and verification; downloadable computer software for blockchain technology for blockchain-based data certification, digital authentication, and secure data storage | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software development in the field of blockchain technology, cryptographic security, and digital data certification; Computer programming services for developing and maintaining blockchain-based applications, encryption software, and digital authentication systems; implementation of software for encrypting and decrypting digital data, authenticating digital signatures, and certifying the integrity and provenance of electronic data using blockchain; data encryption services; data decoding services; cybersecurity services in the nature of restricting unauthorized access to computer systems; Data verification services in the nature of authentication of the origin and verification of the integrity of digital data in the fields of decentralized finance, digital assets, virtual currency transactions, and enterprise data integrity management, to determine conformity with certification standards for data authenticity and integrity, using cryptographic technologies, digital signatures and hardware-bound digital identities, all using blockchain technology; computer security services in the nature of providing digital certificates; electronic data storage by means of blockchains; Providing online non-downloadable software development tools for creating blockchain-based applications provided by a blockchain as a service (BAAS) provider; Verification of data by means of blockchains, namely, testing, analysis, and evaluation of digital data of others to determine conformity with certification standards for data authenticity and integrity, and authentication, issuance and validation of digital certificates incorporating cryptographic attestations for verifying the origin, timestamps and integrity of digital data, using hardware-bound digital identities, digital signatures and cryptographic technologies, all using blockchain technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2026 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 25, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |