USPTO serial 79432888
KEYCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KEYCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Antiperspirants [toiletries]; lipsticks; lip glosses; eyebrow cosmetics protective creams containing micellar cleansing water; cosmetic creams skin lightening creams deodorants for humans; nail polish; eyebrow pencils; hair spray make-up for the face; beauty masks fragrances for personal use: essential oils for cosmetic purposes; perfumes; make-up powder; cosmetic preparations for skin care; aloe vera preparations for cosmetic purposes; collagen preparations for cosmetic purposes; bath preparations, not for medical purpose; shaving preparations; sunscreen preparations; eye-washes, not for medical purposes; make-up removing preparations; antiperspirant soap; deodorant soap; dry shampoos. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |