USPTO serial 79433313
PROCUREPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOPENSKI, CLAUDIA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROCUREPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Hosting of software as a service [SaaS]; consulting services in the field of software as a service [SaaS]; platform as a service [PaaS]; application service provider [ASP] services; provision of online non-downloadable software; AI as a service [AIaaS] featuring software using artificial intelligence for improving business operations; AI as a service [AIaaS] featuring software using artificial intelligence for general-purpose reasoning; computer hardware design; computer hardware development; information technology [IT] services being computer hardware, software and peripherals design and technical consultancy; providing information on computer technology; technical consultancy relating to the use of computer hardware; computer development services; providing online information about the design and development of computer hardware and software; computer technology consultancy; software engineering services; software consulting services; computer software development; computer software design; software as a service; software customisation services; editing of software; providing information relating to computer software; software updating; website maintenance; installation, repair and maintenance of software; website hosting services; planning, designing, developing and maintaining on-line web sites for others; IT consultancy, advisory and information services; artificial intelligence consultancy; computer technology consultancy in the field of artificial intelligence; platforms for artificial intelligence as software as a service [SaaS]; cloud computing services; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software; provision of temporary use of on-line non-downloadable operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; data security consultancy; IT services for data protection; data back-up services; design of information technology infrastructure for others; troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems [technical support services]. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |