USPTO serial 79437807
DMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connor W. Oswalt
Connor W. Oswalt IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights Road, Suite #125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrolysis apparatus for electroplating; electrolysis apparatus for removing or shaping metal; all for use in connection with oil and gas wells. | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Oil and gas well casing, tubing, and drill pipe installation, maintenance and repair; oil and gas well construction; oil and gas well plug and abandonment services, being cementing, casing milling, fishing, downhole intervention services, electrochemical removal of downhole metal components, and demolition of oil and gas wells | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Oil and gas well treatment; rental of electrolysis apparatus for electroplating, rental of electrolysis apparatus for removing or shaping metal, all for use in connection with oil and gas wells. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |