Drawing for DINOX

USPTO serial 79441435

DINOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GANESH, HARINI
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan M. Rixen

Jonathan M. Rixen Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metal working machines; machine tool holders for metalworking machines being machine parts; cutting tool bits for metalworking; drilling machines; drilling bits being machine parts; drill chucks for power drills being machine parts; tools being machine parts, namely, metalworking machine tools; milling machines; milling cutters for milling machines; molds being machine parts, namely, molds for use in the manufacture of tools, milling cutters; chucks for power drills being machine parts; machine tools, namely, milling cutters, reamers, broaches, taps, thread milling cutters; holding devices for machine tools, namely, machine parts being work holding fixtures for precision machining applications, metal clamps used for holding piece parts on machine tool tables, jigs for holding a component during machining; drilling machines for metalworking; milling machines for metalworking; diamond-pointed metal-cutting tools; shock absorbers for machines, other than for vehicles; brakes for machines, other than for vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 24, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 23, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance