USPTO serial 79444170
GENUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with GENUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan Feeney
Alan Feeney PCK IP Lawyers (USA) P.C.1717 Pennsylvania Avenue North WestSuite 1025Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Artificial intelligence software for analysis of agricultural produce; artificial intelligence and machine learning software for analysis of agricultural produce; software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of big data for analysis of agricultural produce; decision-making software for analysis of agricultural produce; image analyzers for analysis of agricultural produce; magnetic resonance imaging [mri] apparatus, not for medical purposes, for analysis of agricultural produce; measuring, detecting, monitoring and controlling equipment for analysis of agricultural produce; measuring equipment for analysis of agricultural produce; testing and quality control equipment for analysis of agricultural produce; recording apparatus for analysis of agricultural produce; diagnostic apparatus for testing food; nuclear resonance spectrometers, other than for medical use, for analysis of agricultural produce; food analysis apparatus; testing apparatus and instruments for analysis of agricultural produce. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Science and technology services for analysis of agricultural produce; quality control relating to the hygiene of foodstuffs; inspection of agricultural produce for quality control; computerised food analysis services; testing of foodstuffs; inspection of foodstuffs; testing, authentication and quality control of agricultural produce; quality control of agricultural produce; software as a service [SaaS] services featuring software for machine learning, deep learning and deep neural networks for analysis of agricultural produce. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | LOPE | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |