Drawing for GENUS

USPTO serial 79444170

GENUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan Feeney

Alan Feeney PCK IP Lawyers (USA) P.C.1717 Pennsylvania Avenue North WestSuite 1025Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable software using Artificial intelligence for analysis of agricultural produce; downloadable software using artificial intelligence and machine learning for analysis of agricultural produce; downloadable software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of big data for analysis of agricultural produce; downloadable decision-making software for analysis of agricultural produce; image analyzers for analysis of agricultural produce; magnetic resonance imaging apparatus, not for medical purposes, for analysis of agricultural produce; testing and quality control equipment for analysis of agricultural produce; data recording apparatus for analysis of agricultural produce; diagnostic apparatus for testing food; nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometers, other than for medical use, for analysis of agricultural produce; food analysis apparatus; testing apparatus and instruments for analysis of agricultural produce; all of the foregoing not in the fields of medical imaging, medical diagnostics, and biomedical researchACTIVE—
042Science and technology services in the nature of magnetic resonance imaging for analysis of agricultural produce; quality control services for others relating to the hygiene of foodstuffs; inspection of agricultural produce for quality control purposes; chemical analysis, namely, computerised food analysis services; testing of foodstuffs; inspection of foodstuffs; testing, authentication and quality control of agricultural produce; quality control of agricultural produce; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for machine learning, deep learning and deep neural networks for analysis of agricultural produce; all of the foregoing not in the fields of medical imaging, medical diagnostics, and biomedical researchACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2026LOPELETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 9, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2026LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jun 4, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 31, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 30, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 22, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance