Drawing for NINTENDO DS

USPTO serial 79450548

NINTENDO DS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FISHER, DAVID REUBEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NINTENDO DS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Espenshade

Steven M. Espenshade Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th StreetSuite 300Austin, TX 78702

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Portable games with liquid crystal displays; protective films adapted for screens for portable games; toys, namely toy balls being for games, toy key chains being stuffed toys, water toys, plush toys, inflatable toys, party favors in the nature of small toys, toy balloons, toy building blocks, toy vehicle; dolls; playing cardsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 31, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 31, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 15, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 15, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 13, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 12, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 8, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 2, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 2, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 1, 2026LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
May 21, 2026SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance