Drawing for SCHAERER

USPTO serial 79975006

SCHAERER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCHAERER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Sterilizing apparatus; disinfecting apparatus; all for medical purposes, research and for pharmaceutical use, included in this class; accessories for the aforesaid apparatus, included in this classSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037repair and servicing of apparatus for sterilization, disinfection and cleaning all for medical purposes, research and for pharmaceutical useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 11, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 8, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 23, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 9, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 8, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 7, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 24, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 23, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance