USPTO serial 79975084
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron Silverstein
AARON SILVERSTEIN SAUNDERS & SILVERSTEIN LLP14 CEDAR STREETSUITE 224AMESBURY, MA 01913-1831| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabrics, namely, fabrics made of cotton, microfiber, polyamide, acrylic; fabrics for textile use; velvet; bed linen; household linen; table linen not of paper; bath linen, except clothing | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Lace and embroidery, ribbons and braid; buttons, hooks and eyes, ornamental novelty pins and needles; artificial flowers; false beards, hair or moustaches; lace trimmings; wigs; clothing fasteners, namely, clothing hooks or clasps; hair ornaments | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2019 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 20, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 25, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| May 19, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 25, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |