Drawing for SEA.LIFE

USPTO serial 79975094

SEA.LIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3661207Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 28, 2009
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEA.LIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cecilia R. Dickson

Cecilia R. Dickson The Webb Law Firm420 Fort Duquesne Boulevard, Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, bathing suits; beachwear; belts; cloth bibs for babies; underwear; sweaters; Halloween costumes; dresses; gloves; hosiery; infant wear; jackets; mittens; pajamas; pants; sweat pants; sweat shirts; shirts; shorts; infant sleepers; socks; T-shirts; tank tops; tights; vests; jerseys; scarves; neckwear; robes; sleepwear; night gowns; head bands; wrist bands; skirts; coats; leotards; leg warmers; stockings; panty hose; rainwear; headwear; caps; footwear, namely, athletic shoes; slippers; boots; sandalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
043Restaurant, cafe, cafeteria, snack bar servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 25, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 24, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 18, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 18, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 14, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 27, 2016PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Jan 21, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 17, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jul 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 6, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 10, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 28, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 14, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 14, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 12, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 7, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 7, 2009MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED
Apr 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 2, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 25, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 9, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 2, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Mar 2, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Mar 2, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 2, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 2, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 8, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 8, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance