USPTO serial 79975099
JET LAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3325029Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JET LAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
US
DE
DE
DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabrics made of cotton, felt, flannel; lining for shoes, namely textile linings for shoes; lining, namely textile linings for garments, textile linings for bags; fabrics made of jersey; jute fabrics; velvet, buckram; fabrics, namely cotton fabric, wool fabric, fabric made of mixed fibers, linen fabric; textile labels; woven fabrics, namely narrow woven fabrics, furleen; fabrics made of wool yarn | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Talo Europe GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by PY Acquisitions LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Talo Import-Export GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Talo Import-Export GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Talo Import-Export GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named JET LAG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |