Drawing for NEWYORKER

USPTO serial 79975233

NEWYORKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4239992Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 13, 2012
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEWYORKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

WILLIAM C. WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 EAST 42ND STREET, SUITE 2520NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Products for beauty and body care, namely, [ skin soap, body soap, ] shower gels, body lotions; perfumery, namely, [ perfume, eau de perfume, ] eau de toilette, deodorants for personal use [ ; cosmetics, namely, eye-shadow, foundation make-up, make-up creams, make-up powders, eye-makeup, nail polish remover; lipsticks; make-up ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2025INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Jan 26, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 26, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 13, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 5, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 2, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 2, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 15, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 16, 2014FINPFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 23, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 26, 2013FISNFINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 9, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 13, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 28, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 24, 2012MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED
Jul 20, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 20, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 26, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2012GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Jun 7, 2012GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Jun 7, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Jun 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 6, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 6, 2012PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST
May 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 15, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 15, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 28, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Nov 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 28, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 17, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 18, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 18, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 18, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 18, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 13, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
May 12, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance