USPTO serial 79975306
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Structural parts for transport vehicles, namely, [ casters, handles for shopping carts and carts, ] anti-theft coin-operated locks for shopping carts and carts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2020 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | IRSS | IRREGULARITY RESPONSE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2014 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |