USPTO serial 79975361
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin J. Miller
Martin J. Miller Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP41 South High Street, Suites 2800-3200Columbus, OH 43215United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, electric nautical navigation instruments for boats, instruments and apparatus for determining speed and range of a water vehicle, namely, speedometers and onboard computers that calculate range based on speed and remaining battery life; navigation instruments for water vehicles in the form of onboard computers; automated process monitoring systems, namely, microprocessor based hardware and software for monitoring the condition of machines, in particular of motors, boats and water vehicles, and of batteries and battery systems therein; integrated battery systems including a battery, an electronic measuring device for determining the condition of the battery and the battery performance, and a computer program for determining, forecasting and storing data received from the device, all linked to a readout display; batteries; lithium batteries; lithium mangan batteries[ ; battery chargers; electric cables; speed regulators for motor vehicles; electric switches; electronic off switches for motors; electric fuses ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Feb 28, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |