USPTO serial 79975367
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Geza C. Ziegler
LYNN E RZONCA BALLARD SPAHR LLP1735 MARKET STREET 51ST FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fund raising namely, charitable collections, management and monitoring of charitable funds; trustee services | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Chatroom services, namely, providing Internet chatrooms, providing online chatrooms for social networking; communication by electronic communications networks on social media platforms for social networking | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Education relating to children, namely, conducting classes, seminars and instructions in the field of bullying prevention or promoting friendliness; gaming services, namely, providing online computer games and lottery services; entertainment, namely, in the nature of variety television shows, live musical concerts, theatre, talent shows, reality shows; organizing sporting and cultural activities | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | OP.D | OP.DS (DISMISSED IN PART/SUSTAINED IN PART) | — |
| May 25, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |