USPTO serial 79975376
BIG DRUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4686213Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2009
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIG DRUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White
Adrienne L. White WRB-IP LLPPO BOX 476WADSWORTH, OH 44282UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely, filling and packing machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BDE Verwaltungs GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Tetra Pak Processing Equipment GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by BIG DRUM, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by BIG DRUM, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by BIG DRUM, S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named BIG DRUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 10, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |