USPTO serial 85004126
ASIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4727843Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 28, 2015
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ASIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline M. Lesser
JACQUELINE M. LESSER BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP2929 ARCH STREETCIRA CENTREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus, instruments, and equipment for the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue, in the nature of personal computers, tablet PCs, pre-amplifiers, computer data storage units, data concentrators, remote data concentrators for collecting analog, digital and discrete information from sensors on the airplane, and locator tools for identifying the location of damage and structural fatigue; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures; pre-recorded compact discs and CD-ROMs containing software for the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue; blank CD-ROMs for video and sound recording for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures; data processors for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures; data processing equipment, namely, computer data storage units, pre-amplifiers, personal computers, and tablet PCs, all for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue; computers for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures; computer hardware for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures; computer software for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue in aircraft; computer software for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures; computer programs for the acoustic modeling of structures; acoustic devices for the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue in aircraft; acoustic sensors for sensing acoustic signals from aircraft structures; noise sensors for sensing acoustic signals from aircraft; detector devices for detecting damage and structural fatigue in aircraft; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines, newsletters, leaflets, pamphlets and manuals in the field of detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue; structural and replacement parts for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 2, 2010 |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design in the field of detecting damage and structural fatigue in aircraft; industrial analysis and research services in the field of detecting damage and structural fatigue in aircraft; design and development of computer hardware and software in the field of detecting damage and structural fatigue in aircraft; technological consultation, research, design, analysis and development services relating to electronic, surveying, data processing, measuring and checking apparatus and instruments for detecting damage and structural fatigue in aircraft; technological consultation, research, design, analysis and development services relating to instruments and equipment used for the detection and warning of structural damage and structural fatigue, for devices used for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures, for computer systems and software used for the detection of damage and structural fatigue in aircraft, for data processing equipment and data processing equipment for the detection or warning of structural damage and structural fatigue, computers for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures, computer hardware for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures, computer software for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures, computer software for processing acoustic data for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures, computer programs for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures, computer modeling programs for use in the detection or warning of damage and structural fatigue and for analyzing acoustic signals from aircraft structures, computer programs for the acoustic modeling of structures, and acoustic devices in the nature of pre-amplifiers, noise sensors, acoustic sensors and detector devices, ALL for detecting damage and structural fatigue in aircraft; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software tools for use in detection of damage and structural fatigue in aircraft; installation and repair of computer software, computer software for processing acoustic data, computer programs, computer modeling programs, and computer programs, all for the acoustic modeling of structures, and providing information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 28, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ultra Electronics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Ultra Electronics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Ultra Electronics Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ASIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |