USPTO serial 85006686
SMAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett A. Garner, Esq.
Brett A. Garner, Esq. VENABLE LLP2049 Century Park EastSuite 2100Los Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, long-sleeved shirts, T-shirts, under shirts, night shirts, rugby shirts, polo shirts, cardigans, jerseys, uniforms, masquerade and Halloween costumes and masks sold in connection therewith; scrubs not for medical purposes, smocks, dress shirts, pants, slacks, jeans, culottes, cargo pants, stretch pants, overalls, jumpers, shorts, boxer shorts, tops, stretch tops, tube tops, crop tops, tank tops, tankinis, halter tops, sweat shirts, hooded sweat shirts, sweat jackets, sweat shorts, sweat pants, wraps, jogging suits, blouses, skirts, dresses, sweaters, vests, pullovers, snow suits, ski jackets, parkas, anoraks, ponchos, shawls, jackets, reversible jackets, wind-resistant jackets, shell jackets, sports jackets, jean jackets, coats, blazers, suits, turtlenecks, cloth ski bibs, swimwear, beachwear, beach cover-ups, layettes, infantwear, infants sleepers, booties, baby bibs not of paper, headwear, caps, hats, visors, headbands, wrist bands, sweat bands, ear muffs, aprons, scarves, bandanas, belts, suspenders, neckwear, underwear, briefs, bras, sports bras, panties, thongs, G-strings, garters, singlets, socks, slipper socks, loungewear, robes, underclothes, pajamas, sleepwear, night gowns, lingerie, leg warmers, hosiery, leggings, tights, leotards, unitards, gloves, mittens, rain slickers, rainwear, footwear, shoes, sneakers, galoshes, sandals, flip-flops, and slippers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 13, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |