USPTO serial 85011800
THE RITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE RITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. A. Earley III
JOHN F. A. EARLEY III HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY, P.C.PO BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named THE RITZ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |