USPTO serial 85017120
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessie K. Reider, CA Bar No. 237,113
Jessie K. Reider, CA Bar No. 237,113 Buchalter Nemer, A Professional Corporation1000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Ankle socks, Anklets, Anoraks, Ascots, Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms, Baby bottoms, Baby tops, Bandanas, Baseball caps, Baselayer bottoms, Baselayer tops, Bathing suits, Bathing suits for men, Bathing suits for women, Bathing trunks, Bathrobes, Beach coverups, Beach cover-ups, Beach footwear, Beach shoes, Beachwear, Beanies, Belts, Belts made of leather, Belts of textile, Berets, Bermuda shorts, Bikinis, Blazers, Blouses, Board shorts, Boas, Body linen, Body stockings, Body suits, Boleros, Bolo ties, Bomber jackets, Booties, Boots, Bottoms, Bow ties, Boxer briefs, Boxer shorts, Briefs, Button-front shirts, Caftans, Camisettes, Camisoles, Camp shirts, Canvas shoes, Cap visors, Capri pants, Capris, Caps, Caps with visors, Cardigans, Cargo pants, Chaps, Children's and infants' cloth bibs, Children's headwear, Clothing, namely, arm warmers, Clothing, namely, hand-warmers, Clothing, namely, khakis, Clothing, namely, knee warmers, Clothing, namely, neck tubes, Clothing, namely, wrap-arounds, Coats, Coats for men and women, Coats made of cotton, Collars, Combinations Corsets, Coveralls, Coverups, Crewneck sweaters, Crewnecks, Crop tops, Cross-country gloves, Cross-country mittens, Cuffs, Culottes, Denim jackets, Denims, Dickies, Down jackets, Drawers, Dress shirts, Dress suits, Dresses, Dressing gowns, Dungarees, Dust coats, Dusters, Ear muffs, Ear warmers, Earbands, Espadrilles, Evening dresses, Evening gowns, Fabric belts, Finished textile linings for garments, Fishermen's jackets, Fishing vests, Fleece pullovers, Fleece shorts, Fleece vests, Flight suits, Flip flops, Footwear for men, Footwear for men and women, Foundation garments, Frocks, Fur cloaks, Fur coats and jackets, Fur hats, Fur muffs, Gaberdines, Gaiters, Galoshes, Gloves, Gloves including those made of skin. hide or fur, Gowns, Greatcoats, Gym shorts, Gym suits, Halter tops, Hat bands, Hats, Head scarves, Head sweatband Intent to Use: The applicant has a bona fide intention to use or use through the applicant's related company or licensee the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |