USPTO serial 85018040
ARALIFESTYLE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARALIFESTYLE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Pickerill
JOHN PICKERILL FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH STREETSUITE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for providing online advertising, populating web sites with information, tracking web site usage and facilitating commercial transactions, revenue sharing and electronic commerce over a global computer network | ACTIVE | Nov 20, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 14, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2011 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |