USPTO serial 85018941
GLOBAL FASHION BRANDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBAL FASHION BRANDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
arthur mandel
72 NICOLE LOOPSTATEN ISLAND, NY 10301-4634UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online social e-commerce website providing retail store services featuring clothing, headgear, footwear, jewelry, watches, fashion accessories, textiles, cosmetics, non-medicated toilet preparations, eyewear, carrying cases, leather goods, handbags, and all manner of bags; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, a variety of goods, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods, featuring clothing, headgear, footwear, jewelry, watches, fashion accessories, textiles, cosmetics, non-medicated toilet preparations, eyewear, carrying cases, leather goods, handbags, and all manner of bags; mail order services featuring, clothing, headgear, footwear, jewelry, watches, fashion accessories, textiles, cosmetics, non-medicated toilet preparations, eyewear, carrying cases, leather goods, handbags, and all manner of bags; online retail store services featuring, clothing, headgear, footwear, jewelry, watches, fashion accessories, textiles, cosmetics, non-medicated toilet preparations, eyewear, carrying cases, leather goods, handbags, and all manner of bags; television home shopping services featuring, clothing, headgear, footwear, jewelry, watches, fashion accessories, textiles, cosmetics, non-medicated toilet preparations, eyewear, carrying cases, leather goods, handbags, and all manner of bags; the provision of retail store services via a telephone or mobile phone or mobile telecommunications device featuring, clothing, headgear, footwear, jewelry, watches, fashion accessories, textiles, cosmetics, non-medicated toilet preparations, eyewear, carrying cases, leather goods, handbags, and all manner of bags; direct marketing services featuring, clothing, headgear, footwear, jewelry, watches, fashion accessories, textiles, cosmetics, non-medicated toilet preparations, eyewear, carrying cases, leather goods, handbags, and all manner of bags; business management consultancy; online trading services in which seller posts products to be auctioned and bidding is done via the Internet. provision of information and advice to consumers regarding the selection of products and items to be purchased; advertising for others. computerized on-line ordering featuring general merchandise and general consumer goods; exchange services; providing an on-line commercial information directory; providing a searchable database in the field of business information available via a global computer network; providing a searchable on-line advertising guide featuring the goods and services of other on-line vendors; database management services; advertising services, namely, providing advertising in the nature of on-line and electronic classified directories; electronic auction services via the internet; on-line auction services; providing a website featuring evaluative feedback and product ratings of consumer services of others in the field of rating sellers' goods and services, the value and prices of sellers' goods and services, buyers' and sellers' performance, delivery, and overall experience in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |