USPTO serial 85031793
P6 PRINCIPLE SIX CO-OPERATIVE TRADE MOVEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with P6 PRINCIPLE SIX CO-OPERATIVE TRADE MOVEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Bridgewater, MA
West Bridgewater, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Dunn
Thomas F. Dunn MORSE, BARNES-BROWN & PENDLETON, P.C.230 Third Avenue, 4th FloorCityPointWALTHAM, MA 02451Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cream cheese; Milled flax seeds; Dried soybeans; Processed edible seeds; Processed almonds; Processed nuts; Olive oils; Nut butters; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; soup mixes; Dried vegetables; Powdered milk; Broth; Cheese; Tahini; Yogurt; Salami; Soups; Turkey; Ham; Roast beef; Bacon; Bologna; Bison; Bratwurst; Sausages; Kielbasa; Chorizo; Hot dogs; Processed lamb; Corned beef; Lard; Beef; Frozen vegetables; Meat pies; Shepherds pie; Walnut burger patties; Tofu burger patties; Veggie burger patties; Grain burger patties; Frozen pre-packaged entrees consisting primarily of seafood; Fish cakes; Crab cakes; Eggs; Milk; Butter; Chocolate milk; egg nog; cream; frozen mushroom patties; Frozen fruits; Frozen, prepared or packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Dried persimmons; Dried corn; Dried peas; Dried apricots; Dried fruit snacks; Dried peaches; dried tomato bits; dried fruit salad; dried blueberries; dried cherries; dried pomegranate; Dried mango; Dried blackberries; Dried raspberries; Dried strawberries; Evaporated milk; Fruit-based spreads; Vegetable based spreads; Salad oil; Dip mixes; Jams; Fruit preserves; Marmalades; Jellies; Pickled mushrooms; Pickled Garlic for use as vegetable; Nut and seed-based snack bars; Protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars; Peanut butter; processed Cranberries; canned cranberries; dried cranberries, preserved cranberries; processed Alfalfa sprout; Processed, edible Alaria, Dulse, and Kelp; Baked beans; Chowder; Bisques; Cranberry applesauce; Potato chips; Pickles; Dairy-based powders for making dairy-based food beverages and shakes; Prepared pistachio; Jerky; Roast beef; Uncooked hamburger patties; processed blueberries, canned blueberries, dried blueberries, preserved blueberries; processed Blackberries; canned blackberries; canned blackberries; preserved blackberries; processed Raspberries; canned raspberries; dried raspberries; preserved raspberries; Processed peppers; processed Eggplant; canned eggplant; dried eggplant; preserved eggplant; processed Radicchio; canned radicchio; dried radicchio; preserved radicchio; Processed vegetables and fruits; Sauerkraut; Half and half; Buttermilk; Cottage cheese; Egg whites; Sour cream; Tofu; Whipping cream; Kefir; Falafel; Processed beans; processed chard; cheese; dried egg powder; hummus; peanut butter; Processed bee pollen for food purposes; rice protein for use as a food additive; processed Salad Sprouting Seeds; processed Sandwich Sprouting Seeds; tempeh | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Equal Exchange, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Equal Exchange, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named P6 PRINCIPLE SIX CO-OPERATIVE TRADE MOVEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |