USPTO serial 85045103
MEDIANET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDIANET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tamar Niv Bessinger
JENNIFER INSLEY-PRUITT FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail store services featuring downloadable electronic publications | ABANDONED | Jan 11, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |