USPTO serial 85062632
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley P. Hartman
BRADLEY P. HARTMAN HARTMAN TITUS PLC7114 E. STETSON DR.SUITE 205SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-3250| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Chargers for batteries; electrical power distribution units; fast-charge systems for electric vehicles; electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE); electrical energy utilization metering devices complete with related software; DC fast chargers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Construction project management; Consulting services for others in the field of repair and installation of electric vehicle chargers; Consulting services for others in the field of installing, servicing and deployment of chargers for electric vehicles; Installation and maintenance of electrical vehicle supply systems and equipment and computer hardware; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of repair of electrical vehicle supply systems and equipment and repair of computer hardware; Battery charging services in the nature of providing third party users with access to electric vehicle chargers and charging infrastructure through membership accounts and subscription accounts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Product research and development in the field of batteries; Product testing of the life-cycle of batteries; Product research and development in the field of hydrogen fueling infrastructure technology; Design and development of software and hardware for the deployment of hydrogen fueling stations; Product testing in the field of vehicles for automobile manufacturers, plug-in vehicle converters, government agencies and research institutions; Product development in the field of battery fast-charging technology for on-road electric vehicles, automated guided vehicles, material handling, airline, marine and transit applications; Product research and development in the fields of battery chargers, electric vehicle charging systems, DC fast chargers, electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE), fast-charge systems for electric vehicles, material handling and airport ground support applications, plug-in hybrid vehicles, advanced battery systems, and hydrogen internal combustion engine conversions; Technological consultation in the technology field of electric vehicles, batteries, electric vehicle chargers, and hydrogen fueling of vehicles; Product development, namely, development of commercial and residential electric vehicle charging station infrastructure; Product development in the field of residential, commercial, and municipal electric vehicle charging station infrastructure in the nature of residential vehicle chargers, commercial vehicle chargers, DC fast-chargers, and chargers for electric industrial off-road vehicles; Consulting services for others in the field of design of electric vehicle chargers; Technical consulting services for others in the field of designing and planning chargers for electric vehicles; Installation and maintenance of computer software for electrical vehicle supply systems and equipment; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting computer software problems for electrical vehicle supply systems and equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |