CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RECYCLE MORE

USPTO serial 85066032

RECYCLE MORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RECYCLE MORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leah M.P. Hedman

Leah M.P. Hedman OFFICE OF THE MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERALSUITE 900, BREMER TOWER445 MINNESOTA STREETST. PAUL, MN 55101-2127

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Developing advertising campaigns for others geared toward environmental issuesACTIVEAug 23, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 21, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 21, 2011EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 21, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2011ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2011EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2011INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jul 13, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 11, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 11, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance