USPTO serial 85066897
SEE CLEARLY. ACT SWIFTLY.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEE CLEARLY. ACT SWIFTLY.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs
Heidi L. Sachs Perkins Coie LLP1201 Third AvenueSuite 4800Seattle, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; computer software that uses, in part, real time traffic intelligence and analytical tools, forensic analysis, mathematical formulas and other rule sets to detect and manage anomalous data traffic over IP and other telecom and data networks; computer; computer software for gathering, managing, analyzing, and mitigating data traffic on IP and other data networks for the purpose of network security, traffic management, traffic monitoring, traffic mediation, and exfiltration; computer software for gathering customer information and service usage information from data networks, and for delivering or facilitating internet business infrastructure applications, namely, billing mediation, billing, customer care, fraud detection, customer retention, system provisioning, usage profiling and analysis, profitability analysis, quality of service measurement, network address translator device detection, and service level agreement monitoring; computer software for use in visualizing captured data in the exact manner in which it was sent or received; computer software to reconstruct web-pages, playback VoIP traffic data, and reconstruct e-mails; computer software for use in analyzing anomalous and lawfully intercepted internet traffic data; computer software for use in capturing internet traffic around a specific event, anomalous behavior or specific computer; computer software for use in analyzing computer network intrusions, misuses, and abuses; computer software for use in managing computer network security; computer software for use in electronic interception; computer software for use in delivering electronic surveillance data to law enforcement agencies; computer software that isolates an intercept subject's communications; computer software that isolates call-identifying information from other individual's communication; computer software to control the targeting and interception of warrants; computer software to manage warrant information and workflow associated with a court ordered intercept; computer software for use in analyzing and controlling Internet and telecommunications network traffic; computer software for use in analyzing customer usage of global computer and telecommunication networks; visualization software, namely computer software for use in displaying customer usage of global computer and telecommunication networks; computer software for use in analyzing customer access to global computer and telecommunications networks for market research; computer software for use in preparing reports on Internet traffic and Internet usage; computer software for use by telecommunication carriers to manage global computer and telecommunication network performance; computer software to see trends developing, set measured usage criteria, and investigate high volumes of data over global computer and telecommunication networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |