USPTO serial 85068479
LIGHTINGMANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3995359Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2011
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIGHTINGMANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard Sobelman
HOWARD SOBELMAN SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.1 ARIZONA CENTER 400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Window shading control systems for adjustment of window shades, namely, electrical components comprising electric sensors, electrical relays, electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points, computer software for use in database management, acquiring data, analyzing data and sending adjustment signals, computer hardware, computer processors, computer memories, and computer networking hardware; computerized window shading control systems for electronic adjustment of window shades, namely, electrical components, comprising computer processors, computer memories, computer networking hardware, electric sensors, electrical relays, electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points, computer software for use in database management, acquiring data, analyzing data and sending adjustment signals; window shading control systems for adjustment of window shades based on monitoring and analysis of sky conditions, artificial illumination measurement, reporting sensors, daylighting program, namely, electrical components comprising electric sensors, electrical relays, electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points, computer hardware, computer processors, computer memories, and computer networking hardware, and a building management system for controlling illumination, heat gain, heat loss, brightness, glare, solar penetration, artificial illumination, daylighting and solar gain, namely, electrical components comprising computer processors, computer memories, computer networking hardware, electric sensors, electrical relays, electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points, computer software for use in database management, acquiring data, analyzing data and sending adjustment signals; and window shading control systems for two way communication with building subsystems, building management systems, illumination control systems, and daylighting control systems, namely, comprising electrical components, computer processors, computer memories, computer networking hardware, electric sensors, electrical relays, electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points, computer software for use in database management, acquiring data, analyzing data and sending adjustment signals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |