USPTO serial 85075294
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Reifenhäuser GmbH & Co. KG Maschinenfabrik
D-53839 Troisdorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by Reifenhäuser GmbH & Co. KG Maschinenfabrik
Reifenhäuser GmbH & Co. KG Maschinenfabrik
D-53839 Troisdorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by Reifenhäuser GmbH & Co. KG Maschinenfabrik
Reifenhäuser GmbH & Co. KG Maschinenfabrik
D-53839 Troisdorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by Reifenhäuser GmbH & Co. KG Maschinenfabrik
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Fredbeck
ANDREW N. FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Extrusion machines for the production of tubular films; extrusion machines for the manufacturing of objects of thermoplastics; production machines for manufacturing of extruded films; production equipment, namely, extruders, die-heads, calibration cages, take-off units, dosing units, winders, conveyor belts and machines for manufacturing of extruded films; vacuum hoisting machinery and conveyors; conveying apparatus for plastic granules and for film webs; blowing machines for compression, suction and for the transport of gases; mono blow film machines, multi-layer blow film machines; machine parts namely, blown film dies, cooling rings and heat sinks for film tubes in for blow film extrusion machines; machine parts, namely, screw extruders and vacuum conveyors for blow film extrusion machines for plastic granules and plastic materials in molten state; machine parts, namely, extruders and blown film dies for blow film extrusion machines; film take-off units and film winders for film extrusion plants; machine parts, namely, oscillating film take-off units as parts of blow film extrusion machines; machine parts, namely, spiral mandrel distributors and pre-distributors as parts of blow film extrusion machines; fans for machine engines, namely, cooling fans for blow film lines, as machine parts; machine parts, namely, turning bars and guide rollers as parts of blow film extrusion machines; machine parts, namely, brush rollers for blow film lines; machine parts, namely, spreader rollers, temperature rollers and cooling rollers for blow film extrusion machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic control systems for film extrusion machines; industrial measuring systems, namely, thickness control, width control, layer control, layer thickness control, temperature control, pressure control, line speed control, web speed control, RPM control, control of web position, tension control, torque control, charging level sensors, liquid level sensors, limit switches, proximity switches, electronic apparatus for testing film extrusion machines; industrial materials testing and calibration devices for calibrating film extrusion machines; calibration devices for calibrating film extrusion machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Conceptual design of film extrusion machines and film extrusion plants; technical consulting in relation to engineering of film extrusion machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |