Drawing for HYDRIVE

USPTO serial 85078117

HYDRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Salter

ROBERT SALTER SALTER & MICHAELSON321 S MAIN ST STE 501PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-7114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardwareABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 9, 2011RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
May 9, 2011RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
May 9, 2011RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Apr 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 1, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance