USPTO serial 85083944
KNOCKOFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KNOCKOFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Morrisville, NC
Morrisville, NC
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable computer software for use on computers and wireless devices for entertainment, games, education and training purposes, namely, computer software which educates, informs, instructs and trains people in the fields of brand management, brand protection, supply chain management, loss prevention, security, anti-counterfeiting, counterfeiting, consumer behavior, exporting, importing, international trade, customs and customs enforcement, trademarks, government relations and lobbying, and law enforcement through computer-based games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing on-line training in the nature of classes, seminars and workshops in the field of brand management, brand protection, supply chain management, loss prevention, security, anti-counterfeiting, counterfeiting, consumer behavior, exporting, importing, international trade, customs and customs enforcement, trademarks, government relations and lobbying, and law enforcement; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |