CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FRS LEARNING SYSTEM

USPTO serial 85084139

FRS LEARNING SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRS LEARNING SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey R. Cadwell

JEFFREY R. CADWELL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S 6TH ST STE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1553UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational and Training Services, Namely, Providing Classes, Lessons, and Instruction in the Fields of Firearms, Firearm Operation and Safety, Shooting, Marksmanship, Target Practice, Self Defense, Hunting, and Other Outdoor Skills, and Distribution of Course Materials in Connection Therewith; Gun Firing Ranges; Providing Online Information in the Field of Recreational Activities, Namely, Shooting, Marksmanship, Target Practice, Hunting, and Other Outdoor Recreational Skills; Providing Online Training Information on the Operation of FirearmsACTIVE—
045Providing Online Information in the Fields of Firearm Safety and Self-DefenseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2010CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2010GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2010GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance