USPTO serial 85092294
ALL BLACK EVERYTHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALL BLACK EVERYTHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Samuel, Esq.
Mark A. Samuel, Esq. MARK A SAMUEL PC2610 Frederick Douglass BoulevardNEW YORK, NY 10030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Button down shirts; Coats for men and women; Collard shirts; Custom made to measure suits for men and women; Dress shirts; Footwear; Footwear for men; Footwear for men and women; Footwear for women; Footwear not for sports; Gloves as clothing; Golf shirts; Headbands for clothing; Hooded sweat shirts; Hoods; Jackets; Jerseys; Knit shirts; Leather belts; Long-sleeved shirts; Men's and women's jackets; coats, trousers, vests; Men's suits, women's suits; Pocket squares; Polo shirts; Shirts and short-sleeved shirts; Sports shirts; Sports shirts with short sleeves; T-shirts; Ties; Turtle neck shirts; Wearable garments and clothing, namely, shirts; Women's hats and hoods; Women's shoes; Women's tops, namely, camis; Women's underwear, excluding clothing, footwear and headgear in relation to the sport of Rugby and sports equipment relating to the sport of Rugby | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 24, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |