USPTO serial 85094122
MICROBARRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROBARRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Kimmer
Robert J. Kimmer Rader, Fishman & Grauer, PLLC1233 20th Street, N.W.Suite 501Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Anticorrosive paints; Architectural protective coatings; Bactericidal paints; Chemicalproof paints; Clear and pigmented coatings used in the nature of paint; Clear coating protectant for aluminum surfaces; Coating composition in the nature of paint for industrial applications; Coating compositions in the nature of paint containing thermosetting resins and thermoplastic resins used to coat metal products, for industrial applications; Coating compositions in the nature of paint for industrial applications; Coating preparations having water repellent properties; Coatings for wood as paints; Coatings in the nature of industrial sealants for waterproofing and surface hardening; Concrete moisture barrier coating; Concrete sealers in the form of a coating; Corrosion inhibitants in the nature of a coating; Damp proofing paints; Exterior paint; Exterior surface protective coatings; Floor protection varnishes; Interior paint; Lacquers in the nature of a coating; Paint for concrete floors; Paint primers; Paint sealers; Paints; Paints and lacquers; Primers for preparing surfaces to be painted; Resin-based coatings for use on roofs, walls and pavements; Rust preservatives in the nature of a coating; Rust preventatives in the nature of a coating; Synthetic resin paints; Vitreous enamel paints; Water repellent paints; Water-based roof coatings; Waterproof paints; Weatherproofing coatings | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Antibacterial/antimicrobial tape for the purpose of destroying bacteria, mold and mildew; Antimicrobial coatings to treat the growth of mold, mildew, bacteria and fungus on various surfaces; Chemical preparations for treating mildew; Chemical preparations to treat mildew; Mold inhibitor for treating wood products, siding, drywall, decking, studs, basement walls, painted surfaces, shake shingles, concrete walkways, joists, fencing, patios, fiberglass, tile, fiberglass shingles, painted concrete, flooring and patio furniture of wood, plastic and/or metal, boat-related items including, but not limited to, rubber seats, caulking, vinyl and painted surfaces, teak decking, boat seats, wood, plastic or metal deck furniture, cordage and natural fibers and compartments, camping-related items including, but not limited to, plastic or metal outdoor furniture, cordage and natural fibers, farming-related items including, but not limited to wood products, siding, brick, crating, fencing, concrete, floors, walls, vinyl, boxing and treated wood products; Mold inhibitors for treating mold growth in and around buildings; Preparations to destroy mildew | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Artificial timber; Building materials, namely, wood, timber, plywood, fiber, and particle boards; Building timber; Cement bonded particle board; Chemically treated lumber for aquatic uses; Construction materials, namely, composite panels consisting of a rigid expanded polystyrene core bonded to an outer skin of MDF (medium-density fiberboard) wood sheet; Construction timber; Fiberboard; Fiberboards; Lumber; Partly processed timber; Plywood; Plywood board; Pressure treated lumber containing a factory-applied water repellant; Pressure-treated lumber with a factory-applied water repellant; Structural timber; Timber | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Compressed wood particles for absorbency; Mulch; Natural recycled wood fiber mulch for use as a playground ground cover; Wood chips for use as ground cover; Wood shavings for animal bedding | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REED, MICHAEL E.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named MICROBARRIER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |