Drawing for RAINFOREST

USPTO serial 85099901

RAINFOREST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAINFOREST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil M. Zipkin

NEIL M ZIPKIN AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVE FL 21NEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018umbrellas, all-purpose carrying bags, pocketbooksACTIVESep 17, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 4, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 4, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 7, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 22, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 22, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 22, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 22, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 17, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Aug 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 7, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance