USPTO serial 85113833
EXPERIENCE HARD WORK INGENUITY RESULTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXPERIENCE HARD WORK INGENUITY RESULTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M. Byrne
LINDA M. BYRNE CRAWFORD MAUNU PLLC1150 NORTHLAND DR STE 100SAINT PAUL, MN 55120-1294UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, newsletters and brochures relating to patents, trademarks, copyrights and related intellectual property matters | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online newsletters featuring articles and commentary in the field of patents, trademarks, copyrights and related intellectual property matters; providing online brochures in the field of patents, trademarks, copyrights and related intellectual property matters | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Patent and trademark agent services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sim & McBurney
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named EXPERIENCE HARD WORK INGENUITY RESULTS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |