Drawing for GELATO CUP

USPTO serial 85130361

GELATO CUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GELATO CUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca J. Stempien

REBECCA J STEMPIEN COYLE LEVY & GRANDINETTIPO BOX 18385WASHINGTON, DC 20036-8385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030frozen novelties and desserts, namely, gelato, ice cream, frozen custard, frozen yogurt, sorbet, gelato desserts, ice cream desserts, frozen custard desserts, frozen yogurt desserts, and sorbet dessertsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 4, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 4, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 20, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 4, 2012RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jan 4, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Dec 30, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 30, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 30, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 30, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 30, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 17, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 18, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance