USPTO serial 85137248
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Auburn Hills, MI
Auburn Hills, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. DuRoss/Jessica S. Sachs
LISA M DUROSS HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE PLC5445 CORPORATE DRIVESUITE 200TROY, MI 48098| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for retail floor planning, merchandise planning, space planning, space management, space optimization, store design, store modeling, store performance measurement, fixture management, and data analysis for use in the retail industry; computer software for optimizing spaces, category adjacencies, and stocking configurations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2009 |
| 035 | preparation of business reports detailing retail space optimization, category adjacencies and representing stocking configurations for others; preparing business reports on spatial mapping, retail space optimization, inventory space optimization, planograms, and retail fixture attributes and location for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2009 |
| 042 | information and data analysis relating to planning and laying out design for the interior space of retail business establishments, warehouses and distribution centers, namely, spatial mapping services for others, spatial mapping of floor plans for product shelving and product displays for others, spatial mapping of product shelving and product displays for others, spatial mapping of fixtures, fixture attributes and location, product categories, and product category adjacencies for others; information and data analysis relating to planning and laying out design for the interior space of retail business establishments, warehouses and distribution centers specifically information and data relating to spatial mapping, retail space optimization, inventory space optimization, planograms, and retail fixture attributes and location; database development services specializing in databases that provide information on inventory space information, spatial mapping, retail space optimization, inventory space optimization, planograms, retail fixture attributes and location, category adjacencies and stocking configurations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |