USPTO serial 85141244
RAINSHOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAINSHOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
58675 Hemer, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Holt
William H. Holt Law Offices of William H. Holt14584 West Dartmouth AvenueLakewood, CO 80228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | SANITARY PLUMBING FITTINGS, NAMELY, DRAINS, SHOWER CONTROL VALVES, COUPLERS AND SINK STRAINERS; MIXER FAUCETS FOR HOT AND COLD WATER PIPES; SHOWERS, SHOWER FITTINGS, NAMELY, ESCUTCHEONS; SHOWER SYSTEM PRIMARILY COMPOSED OF MASSAGE SHOWER HEADS, SHOWER HEAD SPRAYERS, SHOWER PANELS; AUTOMATIC FAUCETS; GAS WATER HEATER FOR SHOWER CONSISTING OF CIRCULATION PUMP WITH THERMOSTAT TO FILL, RE-HEAT WATER AND KEEP WATER WARM, NOT INCLUDING DECHLORINATING SHOWER FILTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |