Drawing for DENTISTS' CHOICE

USPTO serial 85146632

DENTISTS' CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENTISTS' CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. Robert von Hellens

C ROBERT VON HELLENS THE VON HELLENS LAW FIRM LTD7330 N 16TH ST STE C201PHOENIX, AZ 85020-5275UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Dentifrice, non-medicated mouth rinse, and breath freshenerACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 6, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 6, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 20, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 2, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 2, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 2, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 2, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 11, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 13, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Oct 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 9, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance