USPTO serial 85157504
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
FAIRFIELD, NJ
Fairfield, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason A. Bernstein
Jason A. Bernstein Barnes & Thornburg LLP3475 Piedmont Road, NESuite 1700Atlanta, GA 30305-3327| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | sundried PROCESSED tomatoes; feta cheese; Cheese; cheese food; cheese spreads; cooking oil; cottage cheese; crumbled feta cheese; dips; Feta cheese spreads; olive oil; olive oil for foods; pate | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2014 |
| 030 | chai tea; coffee and tea; Crackers; frozen yogurt mixes; garlic salt; green tea; herb tea; herbal teas; instant tea; meat gravies; pasta sauce; Salt; Sauces; sea salt for cooking; Tea ; tea bags; vinegar | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2013 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 8, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |