USPTO serial 85160223
DRIVESAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRIVESAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kermit D. Lopez
Kermit D. Lopez Ortiz & Lopez, PLLCP.O. Box 4484Albuquerque, NM 87196UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Monitoring vehicles for commercial purposes; Business services provided to the fleet industry, namely, collecting and analyzing data related to business management for the review and rating of recorded and live video and data of driver behavior based on vehicle shock and vibration events for use by fleet managers and drivers | ACTIVE | Jul 23, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |