USPTO serial 85160711
LANEIGE WATER SUPREME PRIMER BASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4216214Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2012
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LANEIGE WATER SUPREME PRIMER BASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John K. Park
JOHN K. PARK PARK LAW FIRM3255 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1110LOS ANGELES, CA 90010-1415UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; Cosmetic creams; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Cosmetic preparations for Skin care; Make-up base; Make-up powder; Mascara; Creamy foundation; Lipsticks; Lip gloss; Nail polishes; Solid powder for compacts; Dentifrices; Abrasives, namely, flexible abrasives and skin abrasive preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMOREPACIFIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by AMOREPACIFIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by AMOREPACIFIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LANEIGE WATER SUPREME PRIMER BASE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 18, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2012 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |