Drawing for BRAINTREE

USPTO serial 85161511

BRAINTREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ALVAREZ, COURTNEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAINTREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Blake Simpson Fricks

Blake Simpson Fricks Smith AndersonPO Box 2611Raleigh, NC 27602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing an on-line forum for academic and consumer research; Providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the fields of academic and consumer research; Providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of academic and consumer research for trading services in which buyers post questions regarding any topic, namely, research, information, or technical questions, and sellers electronically respond with answers to such buyers' questions; Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning academic and consumer research; Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users in the fields of academic and consumer research; Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning academic and consumer researchACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 29, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 29, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 29, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 29, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 24, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 3, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 3, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 3, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 3, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 2, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 29, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance