USPTO serial 85161721
ECOSPEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOSPEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christa Cole
Christa Cole Nestle USA, Inc.800 N Brand BlvdTrademark Dept - 14th FloorGlendale, CA 91203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Heating and cooking apparatus for making tea, tea-based beverages and more generally beverages; electric machines for making and brewing coffee, tea, cocoa, and cappuccino, electric coffee machines, electric milk heating and milk frothing machines, electric tea machines, electric coffee makers, electric coffee percolators, parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; coffee filters not of paper being part of electric coffee makers; tea filters not of paper being part of electric tea makers | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea, tea-based preparations in the form of capsules for making beverages; coffee, coffee extracts, coffee-based beverages; iced coffee; coffee substitutes, extracts of coffee substitutes, beverages based on coffee substitutes; chicory-based coffee substitutes; tea, tea extracts, tea-based beverages; iced tea; malt-based preparations, namely, malt extracts used for flavoring and malt for food purposes; cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; chocolate; chocolate-based beverages with milk; candy; sugar; chewing gum; natural sweeteners; bakery products, bread, yeast, pastry, biscuits, cakes, cookies, wafers; puddings; ice cream; flavored water ices; sherbets; frozen confections; frozen cakes; flavored soft water ices; powdered and liquid mixes for making ice cream, flavored water ices, sherbets, frozen confections, frozen cakes, flavored soft water ices, frozen desserts, and frozen yogurt; honey and honey substitutes; rice; pasta; noodles; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; pizza, frozen sandwiches; mixtures of alimentary paste and oven-ready prepared dough; sauces; soya sauce; ketchup; seasonings; edible spices; condiments, namely, mayonnaise, mustard, and vinegar; salad dressings | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Still water, effervescent water or carbonated water, processed water, spring water, mineral water, flavored water, fruit-flavored beverages, fruit-based beverages, fruit and vegetable juices, fruit nectars, lemonades, and soft drinks; fruit extracts and essences not in the nature of essential oils for making non-carbonated non-alcoholic soft drinks; lactic fermented beverages; soya-based beverages not being milk substitutes; non-alcoholic malt-based beverages; isotonic beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |