Drawing for ULTRA HD

USPTO serial 85162079

ULTRA HD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA HD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger Bora

Roger H. Bora THOMPSON HINE LLP10050 Innovation Drive, Suite 400DAYTON, OH 45342-4934UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019asphalt roofing shinglesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
May 1, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 30, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 20, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 20, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 20, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 29, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2011PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED
Jul 6, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Jun 9, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 9, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 9, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 9, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 9, 2011OTHECASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION
Jun 8, 2011IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Jun 7, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2011TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 9, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 2, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 30, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance